Raymer, M. G. & Monroe, C. The us national quantum initiative. Quantum Sci. Technol. 4, 020504. https://doi.org/10.1088/2058-9565/ab0441 (2019).
McMahon, D. Quantum Computing Explained (Wiley, 2007).
Nielsen, M. A. & Chuang, I. Quantum computation and quantum information. Phys. Todayhttps://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511976667 (2002).
Sanders, B. C. How to Build a Quantum Computer 2399â2891 (IOP Publishing, 2017).
Riedel, M., Kovacs, M., Zoller, P., Mlynek, J. & Calarco, T. Europeâs quantum flagship initiative. Quantum Sci. Technol. 4, 020501. https://doi.org/10.1088/2058-9565/ab042d (2019).
Yamamoto, Y., Sasaki, M. & Takesue, H. Quantum information science and technology in japan. Quantum Sci. Technol. 4, 020502. https://doi.org/10.1088/2058-9565/ab0077 (2019).
Sussman, B., Corkum, P., Blais, A., Cory, D. & Damascelli, A. Quantum Canada. Quantum Sci. Technol. 4, 020503. https://doi.org/10.1088/2058-9565/ab029d (2019).
Knight, P. & Walmsley, I. Uk national quantum technology programme. Quantum Sci. Technol. 4, 040502. https://doi.org/10.1088/2058-9565/ab4346 (2019).
Roberson, T. M. & White, A. G. Charting the Australian quantum landscape. Quantum Sci. Technol. 4, 020505. https://doi.org/10.1088/2058-9565/ab02b4 (2019).
Ur Rasool, R. et al. Quantum computing for healthcare: A review. Future Internethttps://doi.org/10.3390/fi15030094 (2023).
Herman, D. et al. A survey of quantum computing for finance (2022). arXiv:2201.02773.
Domino, K. et al. Quantum annealing in the NISQ era: Railway conflict management. Entropyhttps://doi.org/10.3390/e25020191 (2023).
Kane, B. E. A silicon-based nuclear spin quantum computer. Nature 393, 133â137. https://doi.org/10.1038/30156 (1998).
Marx, R., Fahmy, A. F., Myers, J. M., Bermel, W. & Glaser, S. J. Realization of a 5-bit nmr quantum computer using a new molecular architecture (1999). arXiv:quant-ph/9905087.
Negrevergne, C. et al. Benchmarking quantum control methods on a 12-qubit system. Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 170501. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.96.170501 (2006).
Lanyon, B. P. et al. Experimental demonstration of a compiled version of shorâs algorithm with quantum entanglement. Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 250505. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.99.250505 (2007).
Tame, M. S. et al. Experimental realization of deutschâs algorithm in a one-way quantum computer. Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 140501. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.98.140501 (2007).
Johnson, M. W. et al. Quantum annealing with manufactured spins. Nature 473, 194â198. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature10012 (2011).
Saeedi, K. et al. Room-temperature quantum bit storage exceeding 39 minutes using ionized donors in silicon-28. Science 342, 830â833. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1239584 (2013).
Arute, F. et al. Quantum supremacy using a programmable superconducting processor. Nature 574, 505â510. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-1666-5 (2019).
Unden, T. K., Louzon, D., Zwolak, M., Zurek, W. H. & Jelezko, F. Revealing the emergence of classicality using nitrogen-vacancy centers. Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 140402. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.123.140402 (2019).
Cho, A. Quantum darwinism seen in diamond traps. Science 365, 1070â1070. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.365.6458.1070 (2019).
Krutyanskiy, V. et al. Entanglement of trapped-ion qubits separated by 230 meters. Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 050803. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.130.050803 (2023).
Hassija, V. et al. Present landscape of quantum computing. IET Quantum Commun. 1, 42â48. https://doi.org/10.1049/iet-qtc.2020.0027 (2020).
Gyongyosi, L. & Imre, S. A survey on quantum computing technology. Comput. Sci. Rev. 31, 51â71 (2019).
National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine, Quantum Computing: Progress and Prospects (Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2019).
Deffner, S. & Campbell, S. Quantum Thermodynamics 2053â2571 (Morgan & Claypool Publishers, 2019).
Auffèves, A. Quantum technologies need a quantum energy initiative. PRX Quantum 3, 020101. https://doi.org/10.1103/PRXQuantum.3.020101 (2022).
Elsayed, N., Maida, A. S. & Bayoumi, M. A review of quantum computer energy efficiency. In 2019 IEEE Green Technologies Conference (GreenTech), 1â3, https://doi.org/10.1109/GreenTech.2019.8767125 (IEEE, 2019).
Ikonen, J., Salmilehto, J. & Möttönen, M. Energy-efficient quantum computing. npj Quantum Inform. 3, 17. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41534-017-0015-5 (2017).
Fellous-Asiani, M. et al. Optimizing resource efficiencies for scalable full-stack quantum computers (2022). arXiv:2209.05469.
Likharev, K. K. Classical and quantum limitations on energy consumption in computation. Int. J. Theor. Phys. 21, 311â326. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01857733 (1982).
Gemmer, J., Michel, M. & Mahler, G. Quantum thermodynamics: Emergence of thermodynamic behavior within composite quantum systems Vol. 784 (Springer, 2009).
Vinjanampathy, S. & Anders, J. Quantum thermodynamics. Contemp. Phys. 57, 545â579 (2016).
Goold, J., Huber, M., Riera, A., Del Rio, L. & Skrzypczyk, P. The role of quantum information in thermodynamics-a topical review. J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 49, 143001. https://doi.org/10.1088/1751-8113/49/14/143001 (2016).
Binder, F., Correa, L. A., Gogolin, C., Anders, J. & Adesso, G. Thermodynamics in the quantum regime. Fund. Theories Phys. 195, 1â2 (2018).
Gea-Banacloche, J. Minimum energy requirements for quantum computation. Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 217901. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.89.217901 (2002).
Bedingham, D. J. & Maroney, O. J. E. The thermodynamic cost of quantum operations. New J. Phys. 18, 113050. https://doi.org/10.1088/1367-2630/18/11/113050 (2016).
Cimini, V. et al. Experimental characterization of the energetics of quantum logic gates. npj Quantum Inform. 6, 96. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41534-020-00325-7 (2020).
Timpanaro, A. M., Santos, J. P. & Landi, G. T. Landauerâs principle at zero temperature. Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 240601. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.124.240601 (2020).
Deffner, S. Energetic cost of hamiltonian quantum gates. EPL (Europhys. Lett.) 134, 40002. https://doi.org/10.1209/0295-5075/134/40002 (2021).
Lamm, H. & Lawrence, S. Simulation of nonequilibrium dynamics on a quantum computer. Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 170501. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.121.170501 (2018).
Chertkov, E. et al. Characterizing a non-equilibrium phase transition on a quantum computer (2022). arXiv:2209.12889.
Meier, F. & Yamasaki, H. Energy-consumption advantage of quantum computation (2023). arXiv:2305.11212.
Gardas, B. & Deffner, S. Thermodynamic universality of quantum Carnot engines. Phys. Rev. E 92, 042126. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.92.042126 (2015).
Gardas, B., Deffner, S. & Saxena, A. \(\cal{PT} \)-symmetric slowing down of decoherence. Phys. Rev. A 94, 040101. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.94.040101 (2016).
Gardas, B., Dziarmaga, J., Zurek, W. H. & Zwolak, M. Defects in quantum computers. Sci. Rep. 8, 4539 (2018).
Gardas, B. & Deffner, S. Quantum fluctuation theorem for error diagnostics in quantum annealers. Sci. Rep. 8, 17191 (2018).
Mzaouali, Z., Puebla, R., Goold, J., El Baz, M. & Campbell, S. Work statistics and symmetry breaking in an excited-state quantum phase transition. Phys. Rev. E 103, 032145. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.103.032145 (2021).
Soriani, A., Nazé, P., Bonança, M. V. S., Gardas, B. & Deffner, S. Three phases of quantum annealing: Fast, slow, and very slow. Phys. Rev. A 105, 042423. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.105.042423 (2022).
Soriani, A., Nazé, P., Bonança, M. V. S., Gardas, B. & Deffner, S. Assessing the performance of quantum annealing with nonlinear driving. Phys. Rev. A 105, 052442. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.105.052442 (2022).
Coopmans, L., Campbell, S., De Chiara, G. & Kiely, A. Optimal control in disordered quantum systems. Phys. Rev. Res. 4, 043138. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevResearch.4.043138 (2022).
Kazhybekova, A., Campbell, S. & Kiely, A. Minimal action control method in quantum critical models. J. Phys. Commun. 6, 113001. https://doi.org/10.1088/2399-6528/aca3fa (2022).
Xuereb, J., Campbell, S., Goold, J. & Xuereb, A. Deterministic quantum computation with one-clean-qubit model as an open quantum system. Phys. Rev. A 107, 042222. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.107.042222 (2023).
Carolan, E., Ãakmak, B. & Campbell, S. Robustness of controlled hamiltonian approaches to unitary quantum gates (2023). arXiv:2304.14667.
Kiely, A., OâConnor, E., Fogarty, T., Landi, G. T. & Campbell, S. Entropy of the quantum work distribution. Phys. Rev. Res. 5, L022010. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevResearch.5.L022010 (2023).
Zawadzki, K., Kiely, A., Landi, G. T. & Campbell, S. Non-gaussian work statistics at finite-time driving. Phys. Rev. A 107, 012209. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.107.012209 (2023).
Buffoni, L. & Campisi, M. Thermodynamics of a quantum annealer. Quantum Sci. Technol. 5, 035013. https://doi.org/10.1088/2058-9565/ab9755 (2020).
Kadowaki, T. & Nishimori, H. Quantum annealing in the transverse ising model. Phys. Rev. E 58, 5355â5363. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.58.5355 (1998).
Albash, T. & Lidar, D. A. Adiabatic quantum computation. Rev. Mod. Phys. 90, 015002. https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.90.015002 (2018).
Golden, J. & OâMalley, D. Reverse annealing for nonnegative/binary matrix factorization. PLoS One 16, e0244026 (2021).
Venturelli, D. & Kondratyev, A. Reverse quantum annealing approach to portfolio optimization problems. Quantum Mach. Intell. 1, 17â30 (2019).
Yarkoni, S., Raponi, E., Bäck, T. & Schmitt, S. Quantum annealing for industry applications: Introduction and review (Rep. Prog, Phys, 2022).
Campisi, M. & Buffoni, L. Improved bound on entropy production in a quantum annealer. Phys. Rev. E 104, L022102. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.104.L022102 (2021).
Jarzynski, C. & Wójcik, D. K. Classical and quantum fluctuation theorems for heat exchange. Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 230602. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.92.230602 (2004).
Sone, A., Soares-Pinto, D. O. & Deffner, S. Exchange fluctuation theorems for strongly interacting quantum pumps. AVS Quantum Sci. 5, 032001. https://doi.org/10.1116/5.0152186 (2023).
Deffner, S. & Lutz, E. Nonequilibrium entropy production for open quantum systems. Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 140404. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.107.140404 (2011).
Touil, A. & Deffner, S. Information scrambling versus decoherenceâtwo competing sinks for entropy. PRX Quantum 2, 010306. https://doi.org/10.1103/PRXQuantum.2.010306 (2021).
McGeoch, C. & Farré, P. Advantage processor overview. Tech. Rep. 14-1058A-A, D-Wave Quantum Inc. (2022).
Uffink, J. & Van Lith, J. Thermodynamic uncertainty relations. Found. Phys. 29, 655â692 (1999).
Benedetti, M., Realpe-Gómez, J., Biswas, R. & Perdomo-Ortiz, A. Estimation of effective temperatures in quantum annealers for sampling applications: A case study with possible applications in deep learning. Phys. Rev. A 94, 022308. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.94.022308 (2016).
Qpu-specific physical properties: Dw_2000q_6. Tech. Rep. D-Wave User Manual 09-1215A-D, D-Wave Quantum Inc. (2022).
Mossel, E. & Sly, A. Exact thresholds for IsingâGibbs samplers on general graphs. Ann. Probab. 41, 294â328. https://doi.org/10.1214/11-AOP737 (2013).
Chen, H. & Lidar, D. A. Why and when pausing is beneficial in quantum annealing. Phys. Rev. Appl. 14, 014100. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevApplied.14.014100 (2020).
Marshall, J., Venturelli, D., Hen, I. & Rieffel, E. G. Power of pausing: Advancing understanding of thermalization in experimental quantum annealers. Phys. Rev. Appl. 11, 044083. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevApplied.11.044083 (2019).
Gonzalez Izquierdo, Z. et al. Advantage of pausing: Parameter setting for quantum annealers. Phys. Rev. Appl. 18, 054056. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevapplied.18.054056 (2022).
Watabe, S., Seki, Y. & Kawabata, S. Enhancing quantum annealing performance by a degenerate two-level system. Sci. Rep. 10, 146 (2020).
Smierzchalski, T., Mzaouali, Z. & Gardas, B. Dwave-thermodynamics.
Wanda Parisien is a computing expert who navigates the vast landscape of hardware and software. With a focus on computer technology, software development, and industry trends, Wanda delivers informative content, tutorials, and analyses to keep readers updated on the latest in the world of computing.
