Arute, F. et al. Quantum supremacy using a programmable superconducting processor. Nature 574, 505–510 (2019).
Zhu, Q. et al. Quantum computational advantage via 60-qubit 24-cycle random circuit sampling. Sci. Bull. 67, 240–245 (2022).
Moses, S. A. et al. A race-track trapped-ion quantum processor. Phys. Rev. X 13, 041052 (2023).
Debnath, S. et al. Demonstration of a small programmable quantum computer with atomic qubits. Nature 536, 63–66 (2016).
Bluvstein, D. et al. A quantum processor based on coherent transport of entangled atom arrays. Nature 604, 451–456 (2022).
Zhong, H.-S. et al. Phase-programmable gaussian boson sampling using stimulated squeezed light. Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 180502 (2021).
Arrazola, J. M. et al. Quantum circuits with many photons on a programmable nanophotonic chip. Nature 591, 54–60 (2021).
Wu, Y. et al. Strong quantum computational advantage using a superconducting quantum processor. Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 180501 (2021).
Madsen, L. S. et al. Quantum computational advantage with a programmable photonic processor. Nature 606, 75–81 (2022).
Zhong, H.-S. et al. Quantum computational advantage using photons. Science 370, 1460–1463 (2020).
Broadbent, A., Fitzsimons, J. & Kashefi, E. Universal blind quantum computation. In 2009 50th Annual IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science 517–526 (IEEE, 2009).
Raussendorf, R. & Briegel, H. J. A one-way quantum computer. Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 5188 (2001).
Li, Y., Humphreys, P. C., Mendoza, G. J. & Benjamin, S. C. Resource costs for fault-tolerant linear optical quantum computing. Phys. Rev. X 5, 041007 (2015).
Auger, J. M., Anwar, H., Gimeno-Segovia, M., Stace, T. M. & Browne, D. E. Fault-tolerant quantum computation with nondeterministic entangling gates. Phys. Rev. A 97, 030301 (2018).
Bartolucci, S. et al. Fusion-based quantum computation. Nat. Commun. 14, 912 (2023).
Vigliar, C. et al. Error-protected qubits in a silicon photonic chip. Nat. Phys. 17, 1137–1143 (2021).
Bao, J. et al. Very-large-scale integrated quantum graph photonics. Nat. Photon. 17, 573–581 (2023).
Bombin, H. et al. Interleaving: modular architectures for fault-tolerant photonic quantum computing. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/2103.08612 (2021).
Somaschi, N. et al. Near-optimal single-photon sources in the solid state. Nat. Photon. 10, 340–345 (2016).
Wang, H. et al. Towards optimal single-photon sources from polarized microcavities. Nat. Photon. 13, 770–775 (2019).
Tomm, N. et al. A bright and fast source of coherent single photons. Nat. Nanotechnol. 16, 399–403 (2021).
Wang, H. et al. Boson sampling with 20 input photons and a 60-mode interferometer in a 1014-dimensional hilbert space. Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 250503 (2019).
Coste, N. et al. High-rate entanglement between a semiconductor spin and indistinguishable photons. Nat. Photon. 17, 582–587 (2023).
Gimeno-Segovia, M., Shadbolt, P., Browne, D. E. & Rudolph, T. From three-photon Greenberger–Horne–Zeilinger states to ballistic universal quantum computation. Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 020502 (2015).
Quandela Cloud. Quandela https://cloud.quandela.com (2022).
Thomas, S. E. et al. Bright polarized single-photon source based on a linear dipole. Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 233601 (2021).
Pont, M. et al. High-fidelity generation of four-photon ghz states on-chip. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/2211.15626 (2022).
Taballione, C. et al. A universal fully reconfigurable 12-mode quantum photonic processor. Mater. Quantum Technol. 1, 035002 (2021).
Pont, M. et al. Quantifying n-photon indistinguishability with a cyclic integrated interferometer. Phys. Rev. X 12, 031033 (2022).
Heurtel, N. et al. Perceval: a software platform for discrete variable photonic quantum computing. Quantum 7, 931 (2023).
Knill, E., Laflamme, R. & Milburn, G. J. A scheme for efficient quantum computation with linear optics. Nature 409, 46–52 (2001).
Nielsen, M. A & Chuang, I. Quantum Computation and Quantum Information (Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 2002).
Magesan, E., Gambetta, J. M. & Emerson, J. Characterizing quantum gates via randomized benchmarking. Phys. Rev. A 85, 042311 (2012).
Dankert, C., Cleve, R., Emerson, J. & Livine, E. Exact and approximate unitary 2-designs and their application to fidelity estimation. Phys. Rev. A 80, 012304 (2009).
Clément, A., Heurtel, N., Mansfield, S., Perdrix, S. & Valiron, B. LOv-Calculus: a graphical language for linear optical quantum circuits. In Proc. 47th International Symposium on Mathematical Foundations of Computer Science (MFCS) Vol. 241 (Eds Szeider, S. et al.) 35:1–35:16 (Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik, 2002).
Mohseni, M., Rezakhani, A. T. & Lidar, D. A. Quantum-process tomography: resource analysis of different strategies. Phys. Rev. A 77, 032322 (2008).
Crespi, A. et al. Integrated photonic quantum gates for polarization qubits. Nat. Commun. 2, 566 (2011).
Zhang, M. et al. Supercompact photonic quantum logic gate on a silicon chip. Phys. Rev. Let. 126, 130501 (2021).
Li, M. et al. On-chip path encoded photonic quantum toffoli gate. Photon. Res. 10, 1533–1542 (2022).
Peruzzo, A. et al. A variational eigenvalue solver on a photonic quantum processor. Nat. Commun. 5, 4213 (2014).
Bravyi, S., Gambetta, J. M, Mezzacapo, A. & Temme, K. Tapering off qubits to simulate fermionic hamiltonians. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/1701.08213 (2017).
McClean, J. R. et al. Openfermion: the electronic structure package for quantum computers. Quantum Sci. Technol. 5, 034014 (2020).
Lee, D. et al. Error-mitigated photonic variational quantum eigensolver using a single-photon ququart. Optica 9, 88–95 (2022).
Zhang, Y. et al. Variational quantum eigensolver with reduced circuit complexity. npj Quantum Inf. 8, 96 (2022).
Kandala, A. et al. Error mitigation extends the computational reach of a noisy quantum processor. Nature 567, 491–495 (2019).
Nam, Y. et al. Ground-state energy estimation of the water molecule on a trapped-ion quantum computer. npj Quantum Inf. 6, 33 (2020).
Goings, J., Zhao, L., Jakowski, J., Morris, T. & Pooser, R. Molecular symmetry in VQE: a dual approach for trapped-ion simulations of benzene. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/230 (2023).
McClean, J. R., Romero, J., Babbush, R. & Aspuru-Guzik, A. The theory of variational hybrid quantum-classical algorithms. New J. Phys. 18, 023023 (2016).
Gan, B. Y., Leykam, D. & Angelakis, D. G. Fock state-enhanced expressivity of quantum machine learning models. EPJ Quantum Technol. 9, 16 (2022).
Fisher, R. A. The use of multiple measurements in taxonomic problems. Ann. Eugenic. 7, 179–188 (1936).
Havlíček, V. et al. Supervised learning with quantum-enhanced feature spaces. Nature 567, 209–212 (2019).
Bartkiewicz, K. et al. Experimental kernel-based quantum machine learning in finite feature space. Sci. Rep. 10, 12356 (2020).
Aaronson, S. & Arkhipov, A. The computational complexity of linear optics. In Proc. 43rd Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing 333–342 (ACM, 2011).
Zhong, H.-S. et al. 12-Photon entanglement and scalable scattershot boson sampling with optimal entangled-photon pairs from parametric down-conversion. Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 250505 (2018).
Paesani, S. et al. Generation and sampling of quantum states of light in a silicon chip. Nat. Phys. 15, 925–929 (2019).
Gao, Jun et al. Experimental collision-free dominant boson sampling. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/1910.11320 (2019).
Hoch, F. et al. Reconfigurable continuously-coupled 3D photonic circuit for boson sampling experiments. npj Quantum Inf. 8, 55 (2022).
Aaronson, S. & Arkhipov, A. Bosonsampling is far from uniform. Quantum Info. Comput. 14, 1383–1423 (2014).
Spagnolo, N. et al. Experimental validation of photonic boson sampling. Nat. Photon. 8, 615–620 (2014).
Wang, H. et al. Toward scalable boson sampling with photon loss. Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 230502 (2018).
Wang, B.-Y., Denning, E. V., Gür, U. M., Lu, C.-Y. & Gregersen, N. Micropillar single-photon source design for simultaneous near-unity efficiency and indistinguishability. Phys. Rev. B 102, 125301 (2020).
Ralph, T. C., Langford, N. K., Bell, T. B. & White, A. G. Linear optical controlled-not gate in the coincidence basis. Phys. Rev. A 65, 062324 (2002).
Maring, N. et al. One nine availability of a photonic quantum computer on the cloud toward HPC integration. In 2023 IEEE International Conference on Quantum Computing and Engineering (QCE) Vol. 2, 112–116 (IEEE, 2023).
Varnava, M., Browne, D. E. & Rudolph, T. How good must single photon sources and detectors be for efficient linear optical quantum computation? Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 060502 (2008).
Gouriou, C. Design and Fabrication of an Integrated Photonic Circuit for Producing a Maximally-Entangled Three-Photon State. Politecnico di Milano. MSc Thesis, Polytecnico Milano (2019).
Paesani, S. & Brown, B. J. High-threshold quantum computing by fusing one-dimensional cluster states. Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 120603 (2023).
Kieling, K., O’Brien, J. L. & Eisert, J. On photonic controlled phase gates. New J. Phys. 12, 013003 (2010).
Roeloffzen, C. G. H. et al. Low-loss Si3N4 triplex optical waveguides: technology and applications overview. IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron. 24, 1–21 (2018).
Burgwal, R. et al. Using an imperfect photonic network to implement random unitaries. Opt. Express 25, 28236–28245 (2017).
Russell, N. J., Chakhmakhchyan, L., O’Brien, J. L. & Laing, A. Direct dialling of haar random unitary matrices. New J. Phys. 19, 033007 (2017).
Hein, M. et al. Entanglement in graph states and its applications. In Proceedings of the International School of Physics “Enrico Fermi” 115–218 (IOS Press, 2006).
Cao, H. et al. A photonic source of heralded GHZ states. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/2308.05709 (2023).
Chen, S. et al. Heralded three-photon entanglement from a single-photon source on a photonic chip. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/2307.02189 (2023).
Wanda Parisien is a computing expert who navigates the vast landscape of hardware and software. With a focus on computer technology, software development, and industry trends, Wanda delivers informative content, tutorials, and analyses to keep readers updated on the latest in the world of computing.
