A groundbreaking international study led by a researcher at Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health and published in the esteemed journal Scientific Reports has revealed that economic inequality on a global scale cannot be attributed to poor choices made by the less privileged or to the wise decisions of the affluent. Surprisingly, the study found that poor decision-making tendencies were consistent across different income groups, even among those who have successfully overcome poverty.
Despite ongoing efforts to address economic inequality, particularly through behavioral interventions, little progress has been made. There has been a prevailing notion that choice patterns among low-income individuals may hinder effective interventions aimed at improving upward economic mobility, but this assumption had not been rigorously tested until now.
The study utilized online surveys, conducted in 22 languages, with nearly 5,000 participants from 27 countries across Asia, Europe, North America, and South America. The researchers measured decision-making abilities by assessing ten individual biases, including factors such as temporal discounting, overestimation, over-placement, and extremeness.
The findings, coupled with related research demonstrating that temporal discounting is influenced more by the broader societal economic environment rather than individual financial circumstances, serve as compelling evidence that cognitive biases alone do not explain prolonged poverty among disadvantaged individuals.
Lead author Kai Ruggeri, Ph.D., assistant professor in the Department of Health Policy and Management at Columbia Public Health, clarifies the study’s conclusions: “Our research does not reject the notion that individual behavior and decision-making may directly relate to upward economic mobility. Instead, we narrow our focus to assert that biased decision-making does not account for a significant proportion of economic inequality at the population level.”
Ruggeri adds, “Low-income individuals are not uniquely prone to cognitive biases that lead to poor financial decisions. Instead, the scarcity of resources is more likely the primary driver behind these decisions.”
More information:
Kai Ruggeri et al, The persistence of cognitive biases in financial decisions across economic groups, Scientific Reports (2023). DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-36339-2
Citation:
Economic inequality cannot be explained by individual bad choices, study finds (2023, June 29)
retrieved 30 June 2023
from https://phys.org/news/2023-06-economic-inequality-individual-bad-choices.html
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no
part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.