EPA decision in Alabama raises questions about Georgia Power’s coal ash

Georgia Power, like many other utilities, is moving away from coal as a source of electricity. In just 12 years, the company’s reliance on coal for power supply has dropped from 62% to the likelihood of having only one remaining coal-fired power plant by 2028 in the state.

However, Georgia Power is still facing challenges when it comes to dealing with the toxic ash generated from years of burning coal. A recent proposed action by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) in Alabama has drawn attention to Georgia Power’s own waste management plans.

Here is a breakdown of what this government action means for Georgia Power’s coal ash cleanup:

Understanding Coal Ash

Coal ash is a byproduct of burning coal in power plants. It is stored in watery lagoons called ash ponds to prevent it from dispersing into the environment. While coal ash can be repurposed for certain applications, it contains hazardous heavy metals like lead and mercury that can pose significant health and environmental risks.

Georgia Power’s Ash Pond Sites

Georgia Power currently has 29 ash ponds at 11 locations across the state. Some of these sites are in the process of being decommissioned or repurposed, while others are still actively managed. At certain sites, Georgia Power plans to cap the ash in place, potentially posing risks to surrounding water supplies.

Coal Ash Management in Georgia

The responsibility for coal ash oversight in Georgia lies with the Georgia Environmental Protection Division (EPD). Georgia, along with Oklahoma and Texas, is one of the three states authorized to oversee the closure of its own ash ponds. To gain this approval, the state’s program must meet or exceed federal regulations in place.

Alabama’s Role in the Matter

Alabama had applied to join Georgia, Oklahoma, and Texas in managing its own coal ash program. However, the EPA recently rejected Alabama’s application, citing significant gaps in the state’s program that do not meet federal standards. Some of the ash ponds in question are owned by Georgia Power’s sister company, Alabama Power.

Implications for Georgia

Environmental groups have long criticized Georgia Power’s coal ash management plans, arguing that they do not comply with federal regulations. The decision regarding Alabama’s program further emphasizes the need for Georgia EPD to push for changes in Georgia Power’s approach. Georgia Power has expressed its commitment to complying with federal rules and working with the Georgia EPD.

What Comes Next?

It remains unclear if Georgia EPD will require Georgia Power to modify its plans. The EPD will continue evaluating permits and ensuring compliance with established rules. The EPA acknowledges its engagement with Georgia EPD on closure strategies and its commitment to protecting groundwater and communities.

This article is based on information from The Atlanta Journal-Constitution and is distributed by Tribune Content Agency, LLC.

Denial of responsibility! TechCodex is an automatic aggregator of the all world’s media. In each content, the hyperlink to the primary source is specified. All trademarks belong to their rightful owners, and all materials to their authors. For any complaint, please reach us at – [email protected]. We will take necessary action within 24 hours.