Home Internet Big Tech can’t disrupt industry like it did consumer internet

Big Tech can’t disrupt industry like it did consumer internet

Big Tech can’t disrupt industry like it did consumer internet

Dartmouth’s Vijay Govindarajan has a new book that explores how companies are trying to copy Big Tech’s model, combining physical expertise with algorithms and AI. Pradeep Gaur—Mint via Getty Images

Good morning,

We’ve long known that companies like Apple, Amazon and Alphabet owe much of their success to the insights they glean when we use their products. All that data has made it possible for them to streamline strategy, plan products, and create new business models that can disrupt traditional players and disadvantage new ones. Vijay Govindarajan, a top management thinker and professor at Dartmouth’s Tuck School of Business, describes this pivot point as a “shift from product as sold to product as used.” 

“We gave these digital giants permission to collect data on how we live, transforming strategy in the consumer sector,” Govindarajan says. If you don’t pay, after all, you’re the product (although the European Union is trying to give consumers more competition and control with its Digital Markets Act that came into effect on March 7).

But much of that digital transformation has taken place in the consumer sector, where some would give up plenty of private data for the promise of a seat upgrade. What happens when Big Tech’s playbook becomes possible in the industrial sector—at the factories, farms, and other players whose business customers are often as complex as they are? That’s what Govindarajan explores in Fusion Strategy, a new book with Boston University professor Venkat Venkatraman that publishes today. As the title suggests, the authors examine companies that are starting to combine their physical expertise with the kind of algorithms, AI, and interconnected data sets that have made the consumer tech giants so hard to beat. 

I spoke with Govindarajan about why the industrial realm has proven to be tougher terrain for many of the tech companies to conquer. “In the first round, the digital giants won,” he said. “The movie studios, the camera companies didn’t take them seriously.”


“In the second round, it’s not clear the digital giants will win. Industrial companies make physical assets where domain expertise is very important; relationships with customers are critical.” 

With generative AI and machine learning, industrial players can increasingly connect with customers or partners in new ways to mine data for insights and customized recommendations. But industrial customers are not as willing to hand over that prized data as consumers looking for a bump to first class. The issues over data now being debated in Congress have long been table stakes in the corporation: privacy, transparency, trust, and compensation for the value created. More important, Govindarajan says, companies like Honeywell and Deere & Co. know how to fuse analog machinery and advanced digital technologies to create their own solutions.

To that list, let me add Collective[i], a B2B company that’s quietly amassed an impressive roster of enterprise customers who leverage shared data and the company’s proprietary platform to better understand buying and selling activity. The technology has taken years to build and was developed by a team of founders with their own deep expertise. CEO Tad Martin was COO of Overstock, while co-founders (and siblings) Heidi Messer and Stephen Messer created Linkshare. 

I spoke with Heidi Messer shortly after speaking with Govindarajan last week and was struck by the similarities in how she talks about the platform. Unlike in the consumer world, these customers don’t wake up to discover someone’s using their data. They know its value, and the even greater value of sharing it. That’s an interesting metric to consider as we look for the next generation of digital disruptors.

Diane Brady
@dianebrady
[email protected]

TOP NEWS

Kickstarter’s doomed blockchain pivot

In 2021, Kickstarter announced a pivot to Web3 and blockchain, only to back away in the face of fierce criticism from creators and users. We now know the reason for the crowdfunding platform’s doomed pivot: a $100 million investment from Andreessen Horowitz, a potentially transformative amount of cash for the stagnating Kickstarter. But there was a catch: Andreessen wanted Kickstarter to embrace the blockchain, leading to reputational damage that the platform has yet to recover from. Fortune

Barnes & Noble CEO talks Swift

The new CEO of Barnes & Noble wants to get the bookstore chain back to its roots following its 2019 acquisition by private equity fund Elliot Investment Management. “Professional retailers don’t make very good booksellers,” James Daunt tells Fortune’s Phil Wahba. Daunt is now giving outlets the flexibility to deliver what customers want, and he credits items like Taylor Swift albums, Legos, and Pokémon for giving his stores a boost. Fortune

Boeing fails its audits

Boeing failed 33 out of 89 product audits from the Federal Aviation Administration that were conducted after the door plug incident on an Alaska Airlines flight in early January. Boeing supplier Spirit AeroSystems, which made the door plug in question, failed seven of 13 FAA audits. At one point, the agency observed a Spirit mechanic apply liquid soap to a door seal as a lubricant. The New York Times

AROUND THE WATERCOOLER

Top Redditors who want to get in on Reddit’s upcoming IPO have until March 18 to fund the purchase by Rachyl Jones

Half of Elon Musk’s charitable spending appears to benefit tycoon’s empire, including a tiny nonprofit school full of his own children by Christiaan Hetzner

Parents are shelling out nearly $17,000 every year to help their adult children, survey says by Will Daniel

British billionaire Richard Branson poised for a $320 million windfall under obscure exit fee for closure of challenger Virgin Money brand by Ryan Hogg

The Chinese company at the center of Biden’s crane concerns denies it’s a threat to U.S. national security by Lionel Lim

Kate Middleton’s Mother’s Day photo was meant to combat conspiracies. But the ‘attention economy’ is fueling more rumors than ever by Prarthana Prakash

This edition of CEO Daily was curated by Nicholas Gordon. 


 

Reference

Denial of responsibility! TechCodex is an automatic aggregator of Global media. In each content, the hyperlink to the primary source is specified. All trademarks belong to their rightful owners, and all materials to their authors. For any complaint, please reach us at – [email protected]. We will take necessary action within 24 hours.
DMCA compliant image

Leave a Comment