NSF offers a closer look at how the Arecibo Observatory collapsed


Engineers on-site began working to reduce the load placed on those cables, in part by trying to relax a series of “backstay” cables that helped the tower itself remain upright. According to Zauderer, other options involved using a crew tethered to a helicopter to remove weight from the support tower, but safety concerns eventually grounded that idea. Regardless, it soon became all too clear that the Arecibo complex was living on borrowed time.

“After the November 6th cable failure, the [remaining] cables could have failed at any time,” said Gaume. “We were unable to predict when it would happen, [but] we knew it would happen.” Gaume later noted that, no matter what the Arecibo ground crew tried, they “would have never been able to relieve enough load to get the cables back to the condition before November 6th.”

The team’s worst fears came to pass on December 1st, when — after monitoring individual wires snapping under the strain — the second main cable stretching from Tower 4 to the receiver platform failed. The receiver’s weight was then being borne at one end by just two cables, both of which failed fractions of a second after the first one did, sending the platform careening down into the massive reflector dish. Meanwhile, Tower 4 was suddenly free of weight to carry to support, but was still being pulled by seven backstay cables — that pressure sent the top 65 feet of the tower tumbling backwards. And across the dish, the same thing was happening to Tower 12; its top section was sent rolling down a hill near the Arecibo operations building. Fortunately, no one was injured.

Now, the only thing left to do is pick up the pieces — quite literally. Gaume said the NSF expects to have a “full assessment” of the damage caused by the collapse and its environmental impact by the end of this week. And while the NSF hasn’t ruled out the possibility of restoring or rebuilding the facility, it can’t happen without significant input from other parties.

“NSF has a very well-defined process for building major research equipment and facilities,” he said. “It involves Congress appropriating funding, along with assessment and input by the scientific community, including research and other stakeholders. That process would need to play out.”




Get real time updates directly on you device, subscribe now.

This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish. Accept Read More